|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Common Pre-Surgical Concerns
- Common Post-Surgical Complications
- Factors Affecting Patient’s Perception of Disability
- How to Order and Utilize a Psychological Examination to effectively deal
with a, b, and c
|
|
4
|
- Two thirds of back injured patients may have had pre-existing psychological
disorder
- As much as 51% of back injuries cases had pre-existing personality
disorder
- Georgia cases often have 8th grade education, 4th
grade reading and
sub-average IQ
|
|
5
|
- Functional Overlay
- Conscious Embellishment
- In excess of objective findings
- Non-physiologic Indicators
- Symptom Amplification
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- False Conception: Let’s Exclude All Possible Physical Causes first and
“see where it goes.”
- Fear of Offending The Patient or Surgeon
- Lack of Clinical Sophistication on the Surgeon’s, Nurse’s, Adjustor’s,
or Attorney’s Part
- Mistake: Waiting until the last moment to obtain psychological data.
This makes the request seem like a blockade, rather than a necessary
gathering of information as part of the surgical decision.
- Solution: Build Your Psychological Database Even While Physical Tests
are Being Obtained.
|
|
11
|
- Reasonably full description (not just the name) of proposed procedure
- Summary of objective data (x-rays, etc) which indicate well-defined need
for surgery
- Surgeon’s perception of patient’s past compliance with conservative
management, such as p.t. and medication
- Predicted likelihood (%) of a successful surgical outcome
- Surgeon’s definition of a successful outcome (vs the patient’s
expectations)
|
|
12
|
- Request that your nurse case manager meet with the patient, spouse or
immediate family, prior to final decision to proceed with surgery
- Ask the surgeon:
- How long should the hospital stay be?
- What will be the criteria for discharge and medication management, and
when should you expect physical therapy to begin?
- What is the normal length of time required for most patients to reach
MMI with this procedure?
- What are the likely residual physical limitations based upon the
surgeon’s experience?
|
|
13
|
- Patient referred prior to diskectomy
- Lumbar bulge/nerve involvement is well documented by diagnostic studies
- Physician was uncomfortable with patient’s presentation
- Adjustor uncomfortable with lack of patient’s concern for proposed
surgery.
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Patient is already using medication beyond that recommended, calls
between appointments for refills,
sees more than one physician or uses mx pharmacies
- Patient asks questions that indicate lack of understanding of proposed
procedure
- Patient asks NO questions about proposed procedure
- Spouse is handling all phone calls and filtering all information
- Patient has not been fully compliant with p.t., injections or other
conservative recommendations
- Patient’s symptoms are inconsistent from one visit, or from one
physician, to the next
- Surgical date is postponed more than once due to questionable conflicts
- Unspoken fears regarding surgery
- The patient is complaining of more pain and urgency than may truly exist
|
|
19
|
- The surgery is coming very late in the injury process after repeated and
unsuccessful conservative care
- The diagnostic findings are underwhelming, but the surgeon still wants
to do the procedure
- A second opinion is resisted by patient, doctor or attorney
- The patient does not have a good support system for post-operative home
recovery
- The patient has not been compliant with care-to-date
- The surgery seems to be recommended because the patient fails to report
relief from conservative management; not because the objective data
indicate a pressing need (such as cord impingement)
|
|
20
|
- 38 y.o. woman, tripped over drawer
- Laminectomy & Diskectomy have resulted in chronic pain
- Alcoholic father died, mother moved to Florida, ex-husband died, lover
has lymphoma – all same year
- Cause of her pain?
- Workers’ compensation denied the claim
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- Patient suffers from recurrent major depressive disorder
- Case has merit
- Some complaints exacerbated by injury
- Patient sought only 4 visits
- Patient could have reduced pain medication if prescribed an
antidepressant
- Ultimately resolution will be postponed by denial of care
|
|
24
|
- Sometimes, an injury is
severe enough that even significant pre-existing disorders must be
addressed as part of a claim.
- Massive trauma to a limb resulting in treatment-resistant RSD or other
permanent limitations
- Multiple trauma from a high fall resulting in fractures, surgery and
protracted recovery
- Sexual or physical assault with resultant PTSD.
- Narcotic addiction when prescribed (iatrogenic) by the treating
physician, even if the patient has a drug and alcohol history
|
|
25
|
- Overtly Psychological
- Claims of Depression or Anxiety
- Claims of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
- Claims of Inability to live with Excessive Pain
- Covertly Psychological
- Anger & Resentment
- Suspicion & Distrust
- Entitlement & Deservedness
- Denial of Addiction
|
|
26
|
- Who determines candidacy?
- How was the need for referral determined?
- How are goals determined?
- How is progress measured?
- What is the structure/length of care?
- What is the contingency plan if the program is not successful?
- Is the need for pain medication increasing, rather than decreasing, over
time?
- Does the amount of narcotics increase over time, while antidepressants
are under-utilized?
|
|
27
|
- Is the patient depressed as a result of pain?
- Is the patient unable to sleep because of the impact of narcotics on
sleep architecture?
- What are the plans for the future use of narcotics with this patient?
- If injections fail, will the patient be able to cope with pain if
narcotics are halted?
|
|
28
|
- Patient is police dispatcher
- Dispatches officer into line of fire
- Patient feels guilty
- Patient becomes hoarse
- Physical findings are negative
- Referral Question: “Can this be psychological?”
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- The Patient’s Developmental History
- The Patient’s Educational History
- The Patient’s Criminal History
- The Patient’s Medical History (addiction?)
- The Patient’s Work History
- The Patient’s Recounting of the Accident
- The Patient’s Understanding of the Injury
- The Patient’s Perception of Care
- The Patient’s Needs and Goals
- The Patient’s Diagnostic Findings
|
|
33
|
- Should Contain
- Brief/Relevant Developmental history
- Relevant Medical/ Injury History
- Educational & Employment History
- Patient’s recounting of injury and care
- Clinical Observations
- Appropriate Diagnostic Testing
- Clear & Useful Recommendations
|
|
34
|
- Patient works brief labor position
- Sustains minor dominant hand burn
- Abuses narcotics, now discontinued
- Continues to abuse alcohol
- Wife leaves
- Hand falls into disuse, RSD develops
- Case about to settle; patient’s hand
becomes useless, requests amputation
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- Factitious Disorder suspected
- Patient unlikely to participate in own rehabilitation
- Discussion with surgeon who feels amputation is now unavoidable
- Decision to treat as amputation, discharge with PPD rating following
surgery
|
|
38
|
- 38 year old male
- Father died in airplane crash
- Lifting 150 lb machinery
- Chose surgical option
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
- Patient has injury and non-injury related triggers for major depressive
disorder which complicates surgical recovery
- Financial consequences & separation
- Niece, her children, her boyfriend move in
- Harassment by ex-boyfriend
- Niece, daughter and boyfriend killed
- Insurer would like to deny all psych as pre-existing
|
|
42
|
- Assault Cases
- Traumatic Loss Cases
- Unresolving Cases
- Cases of Focused Concern:
- Complaints exceed findings
- Patient briefly employed
- Patient resists re-employment
|
|
43
|
- Injury: 40 yo 2x divorced female, 12 months post fall & lumbar
injury, working for warehouse for 4 months. Has had 2 surgeries. Patient
continues to complain of pain, takes excessive medication.
- Case Management: Trying to see if employer has light duty.
- Orthopedic Decision: Patient is at MMI; physician feels patient must be
depressed since she declines a return to work.
- Patient’s Attorney: Depression resulted from fall; needs care
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- Psychological Findings: Patient suffers from pre-existing borderline
personality disorder. Abused by disabled parents, sexually assaulted by
two sibs, physically abused by first husband and in-laws, brother and
stepfather in prison for murder, patient has record as habitual offender,
past drug abuse history.
- Psychological Conclusions: Recurrent depression due to developmental
crises, refer to CAMHC, not disabled from work within limitations,
prefers patient role, will not seek to settle.
|
|
47
|
- OnLine Referral System (via the Internet)
- Psychological Letters (Newsletters)
- Case Management Updates via E-mail
- Question of the Week
- Factoids
- Definitions of Mental Disorders and Treatment
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
- Working in housekeeping
- Pulling out trundle bed
- Has had 11 stellate ganglion blocks
- Has had sympathectomy
- Has had SCS implant
- Seeking additional surgery
- Insurer wants to know her “candidacy for additional surgery”
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
- 10th grade educated w/deceased alchoholic father; mother died
in DT’s after beaten by 7th husband
- Patient sexually assaulted beginning in childhood by mother’s boyfriends
then locked in closet by grandmother so assaults could not be reported
- Sibs and own children are addicts, youngest daughter a stripper, raped
by a husband’s friend, then committed
- Raped again when seeking shelter in trailer park
- Averaging 8 new residences per year.
- Married seven times
- Borderline Personality Disorder, Mood Disorder, Polysubstance Abuse
Disorder as well as Factitious Disorder
- Surgery was contraindicated
- Patient settled but there was concern regarding her ability to manage
own finances.
|
|
53
|
- Venezuelan female injured working in housekeeping
- Lumbar herniation lifting trash bag
- Conservative measures not successful
- Surgery scheduled
- Employer asks for routine psychological examination regarding
suitability for surgery
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
- Passive dependent personality
- Prior office worker and in sales
- Isolated during the days; no English, battling teenage daughter’s entry
into American culture
- Father died due to surgical complications
- Patient was told by surgeon that she had:
- 5% chance of infection or symptoms not improving
- 95% probability that all symptoms would resolve
- Creating nerve damage by delaying surgery
- Psychologically patient is a poor surgical risk
- Education of patient may improve prognosis
|