Referring New Patients  |   Organizations  |   Search  |   Contact Us  
  Home  |  The Practice  |  Referral  |  Disorders  |  Treatment   Discussion Group  |


Question of the Week

The Psychological Letter

Case Management Update
The Practice

Clinical Services

Educational Services

The Seminar Series

Ask Dr. Adams

Curriculum Vitae

 Making OnLine Referral

Clinical Services / Educational Services / Organizations / E-Mail  

Atlanta Medical Psychology
The clinical practice of Dr. David B. Adams is located in The Medical Quarters in the northside of Atlanta at the junction of Scottish Rite, Northside and Saint Joseph's Hospitals. Dr. Adams consults to occupational medicine, surgeons, nurse case managers, insurers and employers regarding the psychological impact of work-related injury and the role of psychological factors in short- and long-term disability. 

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF DISABILITY

OBSTACLE TO RECOVERY

Once a worker is injured, all that is required is prompt and appropriate medical care. With such care the patient will respond predictably, and if capable of returning to work, the patient will do so. Any other outcome is illogical, improbable and not worthy of further consideration.

  For an increasing number of injured workers, this rational statement is not predictive of outcome. In fact, many patients do not return to work when they reach maximum medical improvement. Patients do not leave surgical care even though they are released. And patients often do not comply with efforts to rehabilitate them and return them to productivity.

  This is not inexplicable, mystical or even unanticipated once you know all the data that goes into a patient’s response to even the best clinical care. 

FACTORS THAT EXIST ON THE JOB 

  While we refer to injuries as accidents, there are situations in which they are not, situations in which coworkers, supervisors or aged/faulty/failing equipment contribute to the occurrence of an injury. Additionally, preceding the injury there is job discontent, rancor among coworkers, conflict with employers, and resentment of supervisors. The injured worker sees the accident as preventable. It is not infrequent that they see the accident as deliberate. And equally as often they feel that their employer’s response is not timely, supportive or the least bit caring. They perceive that coworkers are enjoined not to speak with them, and that they, the injured-worker, have become persona non grata. Aside from their family and their attorney, they feel that they have no advocacy. And until you understand this context of injury, rehabilitating the patient becomes improbable. 

LOST TIME AND LOST JOB 

  Additionally, the patient is quite often told, most often inaccurately, that if they make any attempts to return to that employment, they will then be fired and be without recourse. This was summed up well, recently, by a patient who received a call from the employer stating that “you do not have to worry, you have caused us great expense, but we have no intention of firing you.” Prior to the call, the patient had never considered that outcome. 

FAMILY HISTORY AND FAMILY RESPONSE 

  Borrowed from studies and treatment of alcoholism, the family quite often enables disability in two distinct, yet critical, ways.

§          There may be one or more family members who is spending, or has spent, considerable time on disability. This serves as a role model not only for remaining inactive to the passage of life but also a standard for resentment of how the disability was managed, both by the employer and by treating physicians.

§          The often cited concept of secondary gain cannot be over-emphasized: patients receive more attention, affection, relief from responsibility and forgiveness for transgressions when they are demonstrably in pain and/or have observable limitations.  

  These are crucial data, not readily noted in assessment of the patient’s physical status nor sufficiently explored in most cases, yet these factors can guide and determine the outcome of case management.

 

THE MYTH OF PAIN TREATMENT 

  There needs to be grave concern for the patient who has access to not only his/her own narcotics, but to narcotics of friends, family, through more than one physician, via emergency room visits, and from the streets. Even patients with a negative addictive history (yet with a extended family history of addiction rarely explored), the problem of medication abuse can become a central issue.

  Dependence and abuse are not the only concerns. There are also the disorders that arise from narcotic use, even at prescribed levels: mood disorders, anxiety disorders, sleep disorders and sexual dysfunction. Quite often the patient’s psychological complaints are traced to the way the patient is (self-)medicated and the idiosyncratic ways in which his/her nervous system responds to the presence of narcotics.

  A complicating issue is that large, complex and cumbersome medication regimens in patients whose spouse’s control dispensing and/or in which the patient has limited reading and comprehension leads to a lifestyle in which the passage of the day is marked by awaiting the next dosage(s) of the numerous agents to be taken. The other side effects such as somnolence (drowsiness) and consequent napping as well as GI distress, weakness, fatigue, and confusion result in further preoccupation with bodily function.  

THE PATIENT WITHOUT ALTERNATIVES 

  Injuries are most common in high risk settings, often involving heavy equipment and/or construction work. This work is often undertaken by males who have learned to adjust to comparatively high income despite lack of education. Such males have very traditional ways of determining their masculine role. They are to be rough, tough and sexually invulnerable. They now find that identity impugned by their limitations/pain. Perceiving no alternative, they over-compensate by aggressiveness toward doctors, case managers as well as family. They often know, but dare not admit, that their masculinity was tenuously based upon strenuous tasks. Remove that capacity, and their sexual identity is, for them, lost.  

THE IRONY OF THE WINDFALL 

  Injured workers can be tragically short sighted. They believe, or are led to believe, that administrative closure with financial settlement will, in fact, improve the quality of their lives. Follow-up contact with these patients reveals that their funds are rapidly depleted, purchases unwisely made, and that indebtedness had become so great that there was never the potential to financially recover. 

AS GOOD AS IT GETS 

  For a variety of reasons, when they are told by the surgeon that they have reached maximum medical improvement, many/most patients fail to incorporate that reality. This is further complicated when, rather than being discharged, they are turfed to another provider rather than dismissed from care. When this occurs, the patient’s erroneous belief that they will be “totally cured” is again resurrected.

  While these factors ultimately determine case outcome, they are infrequently explored and utilized. 

Send mail to a friend   Contact The Practice

 

© 2000 Atlanta Medical Psychology.