Referring New Patients  |   Organizations  |   Search  |   Contact Us  
  Home  |  The Practice  |  Referral  |  Disorders  |  Treatment   Discussion Group  |


Question of the Week

The Psychological Letter

Case Management Update
The Practice

Clinical Services

Educational Services

The Seminar Series

Ask Dr. Adams

Curriculum Vitae

 Making OnLine Referral

Clinical Services / Educational Services / Organizations / E-Mail  

Atlanta Medical Psychology
The clinical practice of Dr. David B. Adams is located in The Medical Quarters in the northside of Atlanta at the junction of Scottish Rite, Northside and Saint Joseph's Hospitals. Dr. Adams consults to occupational medicine, surgeons, nurse case managers, insurers and employers regarding the psychological impact of work-related injury and the role of psychological factors in short- and long-term disability. 

 

Psychological Aspects of Disability

 

The Psychosomatic Letter
December, 1997

The Uneducated Patient

At best, chronic and refractory physical diseases and injuries represent a challenge to the patient, requiring that he/she determine a future direction, a means of dealing with the residual symptoms, derive meaning from a compromised life, and have the capacity to understand what has occurred.

Health care was designed around a dependency system in which patients rarely participated in preventive health practices and minimally participated in the recovery process. The concept of prescriptive treatment is based upon the patient maintaining a passive role in which a clinician determines what treatment is indicated and how that treatment should be implemented. Patients do not choose which diagnostic studies are indicated. Patients do not choose their interventions, whether they be drug and/or physical therapies. And patients who express strong reservation regarding what they feel is indicated in their treatment are seen as resistant, hostile, passive-aggressive, drug-seeking or simply noncompliant.

Many, if not most, clinicians attempt to educate the patient as to the nature of their problem, the treatment indicated, the risk/benefit ratio of that care, the timeframe in which treatment will occur and the probable outcome. Just as often, however, three problems emerge:

  • the clinician’s time allotment for the appointment does not permit in-depth patient education,

  • the patient is overwhelmed by the complexity of the problem, the information presented and the task of incorporating new data while anxious regarding the findings thus far explained,

  • or the patient is seen (perhaps correctly) as being unable to fully understand the problem.

Under-educated patients, therefore, emerge from two sources which are not mutually exclusive. The patient may, in fact, have little formal education. Written materials and verbal explanation by health care extenders are not readily incorporated. Such explanations make demand upon the patient’s capacity to incorporate the terminology and treatment options into a cohesive whole, and from this "understanding" to provide truly informed consent.

The patient told of the assessment of his/her chief complaint, and having been provided with explanation as to the cause, care and prognosis may, in fact, be an uninformed patient in that there is no intellectual or educational basis upon which the patient can form a functional understanding of the situation. Compliance with care then becomes a recurrent pattern of dependent consent in which the patient remains bewildered or confused if not frightened.

The consequences of treating the under-educated patient are multifold:

1. Due to disappointment in outcome of treatment to date, the patient either increases expectancies from subsequent care or begins to withdraw, perceiving that care has little to offer and has become associated with both pain and futility.
2. The patient is no longer able to separate their own role from that of the health care providers, what they should expect of themselves as well as others and how to best communicate those expectancies throughout the course of care.
3. Patient develops a pattern of either passive-compliance, passive-resistance or passive-aggression in which, inability to verbally express their confusions and concerns in an effective and problem-resolving fashion. has led to a series of self-defeating behaviors, in which they are now participants in the cause of the problems they are experiencing.

The informed clinician, and that whom the patient is most likely to see as effective, is one that is able to communicate to the patient the combination of respect for what the patient knows, can be taught, and needs to know, in order to effectively facilitate whatever degree of recovery is to occur. This may require asking that the patient express his/her understanding of the assessment (problems) and plan of care. During the course of that explanation, the clinician can both add and clarify data.

Unless the under-educated patient feels that his/her role is that of facilitating care, probability of recovery may largely reside in chance. 

Send mail to a friend   Contact The Practice

 

© 2000 Atlanta Medical Psychology.