Referring New Patients  |   Organizations  |   Search  |   Contact Us  
  Home  |  The Practice  |  Referral  |  Disorders  |  Treatment   Discussion Group  |


Question of the Week

The Psychological Letter

Case Management Update
The Practice

Clinical Services

Educational Services

The Seminar Series

Ask Dr. Adams

Curriculum Vitae

 Making OnLine Referral

Clinical Services / Educational Services / Organizations / E-Mail  

Atlanta Medical Psychology
The clinical practice of Dr. David B. Adams is located in The Medical Quarters in the northside of Atlanta at the junction of Scottish Rite, Northside and Saint Joseph's Hospitals. Dr. Adams consults to occupational medicine, surgeons, nurse case managers, insurers and employers regarding the psychological impact of work-related injury and the role of psychological factors in short- and long-term disability. 

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF DISABILITY

POOR SURGICAL RISK

“He says that the MIR shows that I got herninated discus in my lower lumbar...and I reckon he said he plans to take `em out and put plastic ones in.” (sic)

Defining the Patient

For the purposes of this discussion, we are not talking about patients facing elective surgical decisions or life-threatening surgical emergencies. We are discussing the patient who, during the course of post-injury care, is told that conservative measures have been exhausted and that an invasive procedure is now indicated.

To the clinician, the surgical course and direction may seem quite clear. To the patient, however, this decision will likely be problematic, complex and fraught with fear, anxiety, and anticipatory dread.

Determining surgical candidacy requires examining the patient’s physical condition (the surgical need) and psychological preparedness (the post-surgical risk).

The Psychodynamics of the Patient

Our focus will be exclusively upon those patients for whom surgery is necessitated by a work-related injury and/or those who have been in a motor vehicle accident.

Although many accidents and injuries involve some error on the part of the injured person, very few patients are philosophical enough to state the obvious: “I fell...I fell at work...but I wasn’t paying attention, and I could have just as easily fallen at home, in the store, or walking down the street”.

Instead, they are very descriptive about how they see others as having been responsible for their injury, how negatively they feel about the immediate care they received, and how they feel about what they feel has been lack of employer support.

And, despite the risk factors inherent in some forms of dangerous employment, few individuals report that they expected that their work would ultimately lead to injury or that taking a specific route to work could lead to MVA and injury.

Resentment And Blame

For many patients, the occurrence of an injury and its aftermath are characterized by withdrawal of support from employer and excessive nurturance from the family. The human being is a blameful creature. If unable to attribute the injury to the carelessness and negligence of others, the patient will often become blameful of self. Thus, whether angry or depressed, respectively, the patient may be unable to separate between that which has already occurred and that which must now occur.

Preparedness

Most people lead uneventful lives and neglect their health until something forces them to confront a change. Those confrontations which emerge as a result of injury impact a patient who exists chiefly in a state of unpreparedness and naivete.

When injury does occur, most people can accept that there must be health care intervention, perhaps a trip to the emergency room; perhaps being x-rayed, sutured or placed in a cast. They are not prepared for extended recuperative periods and/or a permanent compromise in function despite receiving the best of care.

The concept of surgery, while understandably not intimidating to the surgeon, can impart to the patient that, at least for some time period, he/she will be out of control, uncomfortable, dependent and obedient. The patient will be controlled by many people, many of whom are strangers and will be exposed to both uncomfortable and, at times, both intimidating and embarrassing situations. Privacy will cease to exist and immediate availability of friends and family may not exist.

Despite adequate pre-surgical education of the patient, when surgery is discussed, the now anxious patient quite often ceases to incorporate data. The patient may hear little of what was explained, understand little of what is to occur, and be quite unprepared to function effectively in the surgical patient role.

Fear and Loathing

Many patients feel they have great pain tolerance. In reality, most are unprepared for pre– or post-surgical pain. They fear becoming dependent upon family. They either fear becoming dependent upon analgesia, or they rapidly become reliant upon medication which then dysregulates their mood, disrupts their relationships, and may make them the bane of their surgeon’s existence with endless requests for increasing dosages or seeking medication from multiple providers.

Maladaptive and Addictive Health Behaviors

A very significant roadblock to recovery is the counterproductive habits and behaviors in which patients engage. Consider the patient who needs a cervical or lumbar fusion but continues to smoke after being told that this will impede bone regeneration. Or the morbidly obese patient who has a torn meniscus and needs his knee repaired but continues to binge eat and fails to exercise. It is not a coincidence that many patients who describe themselves as extremely anxious and unable to sleep are also addicted to caffeine in the form of colas, coffee or tea.

Addictive behaviors are not confined to alcoholism and drug abuse, although these disorders are seen with great

frequency among injured workers. Any behavior which prevents healing needs to be identified and aggressively

Addressed. If the patient feels unable to curb intake prior to surgery, they will be even less able to do so afterwards.

In the immediate or acute period after injury, everyone expects that pain will be at a peak and most clinicians medicate accordingly. To the patient, there really is no reason to expect that control of pain is on the immediate horizon. They do not see that their tolerance to dosages is increasing, or that their irritability and depression is correlated to the side effects of their narcotics, as is inability to sleep and problems with headaches and constipation.

Family members will often intervene between the patient and the healthcare system, assuming responsibility for filling out history forms, making telephone calls, and speaking for the patient in office visits. And very importantly, this same process repeats itself after surgery.

Additionally, patients are rarely forthcoming about past or current addictive behaviors, including alcohol intake.

The Determination of Poor Surgical Risk

Issues of expectancy and preparedness are not solely concerns for the patient. The surgeon needs to know what to expect from the patient and to be prepared for that patient’s pre– and post-surgical responses. Increasingly, surgeons seek an objective assessment of the patient’s psychological functioning: fears, perceptions, beliefs, depth of understanding, and self- responsibility for rehabilitation. This includes the planned medication schedule and its goals. Without such a formal patient assessment, we are falsely assuming we can operate upon patients without knowing what operates within them. 

DBA

Send mail to a friend   Contact The Practice
Hit Counter

 

© 2000 Atlanta Medical Psychology.